Toggle ContentToggle Content
Toggle Content Main Menu

Toggle Content Survey
There are no surveys to display

Toggle Content Forgot your password?

Toggle Content User Info

Welcome Anonymous

Nickname

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!

News › Proposed 176th St Development to go to Council
Next Meeting

TBA - September, 2010


News  

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT HIGHWAY 1 & 176th St.

YOU REALLY NEED TO BE CONCERNED!

 

On Thursday January 7, 2010 we received a telephone call from the City of Surrey Planning Department, indicating that a corporate report  is being sent to City Council on Monday, January 11, 2010 indicating that the Proposed Development at Hwy 1 and 176th  can now be considered for Third Reading.  In effect what has transpired, unannounced to us as a community, is that the developer is prepared to go before City Council with a revised plan. Although the developer met with the FHCA Executive and made some changes,  MUCH MORE needs to be done. Here are the key issues that are still of concern:
 
Density Too High – While the developer reduced the number of households from 841 to 698, this is still unjustifiably high density. When the community was consulted in an Open House in June 2008, a total of 518 units were shown – 698 units are 35% more!
There is great concern about the impact of such density on existing infrastructure, including the school system. Fraser Heights Secondary School is well in excess of its capacity, and this development will inordinately impact on the present complex.
Additional concerns about density include the lack of recreational facilities and park land to support such an increase in population. While Tynehead Regional Park has been offered for this area, users must cross two busy highways to access it, making it inaccessible for children and dangerous for adults.
 
Road Access / Traffic
This development is going to seriously impact our community, and the promised traffic study has still not been presented to us.
 
Look and feel of the development – integration into the community
The community has great concern about two aspects of the look and feel of the development: 1) the absence of control over  the drawings regarding style, character and building quality, and 2) the lack of green space due to building density.
 
Commercial Site
The main concern here is the economic viability of such a large commercial component in a small community.
 
Process
The community requested an Open House so that all residents could see the impact of the proposal. This is particularly important as this will be the first location in Surrey that is being proposed for 6-storey wood structures.
 

Please understand that if you are still concerned regarding any of the above items, you must act this weekend in one of the following ways:
  • Call each member of City Council (refer to list of Mayor & Councillors below) and express your concerns with any of the issues above.  If they are unavailable, please leave a voice mail message with your concerns and your telephone number to allow them to return your call.
  • Email each member of City Council (refer to email addresses of Mayor & Councillors below) and express your concerns and issues in writing. You can use a variation of what is written above, but it is best to express your concerns in your own words.
 
Name Office Email
Councillor Judy Villeneuve   (604) 591-4625 JAVilleneuve@surrey.ca
Councillor Mary Martin  (604) 591-4622 MMartin@surrey.ca
Mayor Dianne Watts (604) 591-4126 DLWatts@surrey.ca
Councillor Tom Gill (604) 591-4634 TSGill@surrey.ca
Councillor Barbara Steele (604) 591-4623 HBSteele@surrey.ca
Councillor Bob Bose (604) 591-4624 RJBose@surrey.ca
Councillor Barinder Rasode (604) 591-4410 BKRasode@surrey.ca
Councillor Linda Hepner (604) 591-4626 LMHepner@surrey.ca
Councillor Marvin Hunt (604) 591-4635 JMHunt@surrey.ca

 
To further show your support, attend the City Council meeting on Monday, January 11, 2010, 7:00pm at City Hall.  Hopefully, along with your telephone calls, emails and attendance, this will indicate to Council that we desire further public consultation.




Posted by FHCA_Executive on Sunday, January 10, 2010 (03:54:42) (169 reads)

Associated Topics

News

"Proposed 176th St Development to go to Council" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

Re: Proposed 176th St Development to go to Council (Score: 1 )
by steve231 on Wednesday, January 13, 2010 (21:11:45)
(User Info | Send a Message)
I am frustrated by the outcome of this. Is there anything else we can do now?

I know Bob Bose voted against moving ahead with the project, who were the other two? If there's nothing we can do to stop it now, at least we can make a change at the next election.

Steve Pitkanen



Toggle Content Related Links
 More about News

Most read story about News:
156th St Underpass

Toggle Content Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Toggle Content Options

Toggle Content Community Calendar
September 2010
SMTWTFS
01 02 03
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30

Mon Sep 06, 2010
Event Labor Day
 
Mon Oct 11, 2010
Event Thanksgiving Day
 
Sun Oct 31, 2010
Event Halloween
 

Toggle Content Contact Us

Fraser Heights Community Association
P.O. Box 74051
RPO Fraser Heights
Surrey, BC
V4N 5H9
Contact the FHCA Directors


For registration or problems with the website e-mail the Site Administrator.



The logos and trademarks used on this site are the property of their respective owners
We are not responsible for comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy